Methodology: each issue's direction is a live signal — long/short opens or holds a position, neutral means flat, and every direction change opens, flips, or closes it. Returns are direction-aware (a short gains when the price falls) and compound across positions from first observation to the latest issue. "Price move" is the stock's own raw change, shown separately. Neither represents actual portfolio performance.
Position History1/1 closed trades won · profitable since 2026-07-04
- 2026-07-02Long$157.54 → closed $160.422026-07-07+1.83%
Brief History (23 issues)
After a 31.9% weekly rip the stock still trades 16% above its 20-day, volume is fading (rvol 0.81), and $42.5B of supply hits in four sessions — the odds don't favor chasing. The playbook: let unlock pressure pull price back into the $135 IPO price-to-SMA20 ($121.73) zone before engaging; a break of $116 (half an ATR below the 20-day) means the supply shock is winning, cut it. If the unlock gets absorbed and $135 holds, $160 — one ATR above the 8/12 high of $148 — is the objective. Until then, flat and watching.
Up 30% in a week, stretched +20.6% above the SMA20, RSI7 at 68.7 — the near-term move is spent; the harder constraint is the ~$42.5B second unlock on Aug 20, just five sessions away, with an $11.7 ATR (8% of price) making a chase here terrible odds. Discipline says stand aside: if the unlock clears and price stabilizes on a pullback to $125-133 (within one ATR of the SMA20), reassess a long, with a $118 stop (a half-step buffer below the 121.2 SMA20) and $161 — the IPO-day closing high resistance — as the bounce target. No position for now.
Down 3.93% with RSI a neutral 52.4, holding 10.5% above the 20-day yet still 40.9% below its 52-week high; 40 analysts at $225.79 imply 69.4% upside, but a short listing history leaves no moving-average framework — staying on the sidelines.
Up 4.23% for a 30.4% week with RSI at 55.4, above the 20-day at $120.82; 40 analysts see $225.79, 62.7% above spot, but the 900M-share unlock is still being digested — staying sidelined.
Staying sidelined, while recording a three-brief error clearly: from 8/4 onward I flagged the 8/6 expiration as a foreseeable supply shock, and the actual result was a 22% two-day gain around it. The mistake was equating more supply with lower prices, ignoring that a fully anticipated negative becomes a cleared overhang once it arrives. That said, the core reason for taking no direction survives intact: the name still has no 50-day or 200-day, so a stop cannot be set reliably; the payback on $18.4B of quarterly capex is unclear; and there is no P/E or gross margin to cross-check. Terafab and Cursor are both plans that have yet to land. Wait for the moving-average structure to form.
Staying sidelined, but the part I got wrong needs stating plainly: in the two prior briefs I flagged the 8/6 lockup as a foreseeable supply shock, and the actual outcome was a 6.14% advance on heavy volume. That call was directionally wrong, because the market had already priced the selling in advance. The core reason for taking no direction, however, still holds unchanged: without a 50-day or 200-day, a stop cannot be set reliably; quarterly capex at 2.4x revenue leaves the payback period entirely unclear; and there is no P/E or gross margin to cross-check. A 97.6% consensus upside cannot be supported by verifiable financials. Wait for the moving-average structure to form.
Don't step in before the Aug 6 lockup selling clears; a break of the $105 prior low could accelerate the slide. Wait for the unlock to settle and a volume-backed stabilization before reassessing — sidelines for now. A hold after a break below $105 on shrinking volume may offer a speculative window at $95-105.
Staying sidelined, with firmer grounds than yesterday. Two variables compound: the maiden report knocked the stock 8.8% after hours and the market hasn't finished pricing $18.4B of quarterly capex; and the first major lockup expiry is two trading days away, making early-holder supply a foreseeable shock. With no 50-day or 200-day, even a technical stop cannot be set reliably. Taking a direction with no moving-average anchor, the weakest financial transparency here, and a scheduled supply shock in two days means paying for uncertainty with position risk. Revisit after the lockup.
Up 5.68% but down 28.3% on the month with RSI still soft at 38.3, no moving-average history and no verifiable financials. The 99.2% consensus upside cannot be independently checked; sidelines.
Up 2.56% but halved from the $225.64 post-IPO high, RSI 36.4. At 62x sales with negative EPS and less than two months of trading history, there is no verifiable structure — remain on the sidelines
Watchlist: -12.4% on the week, -21.7% on the month — WSB rank 5 heat can't fix the float; the SpaceXAI-SMCI data-center build is the one new bright spot, wait for stabilization
The -34.4% monthly grind isn't over, and WSB's #4 ranking can't fix the float structure — sidelines until the next Starship launch
Passive flows are spent and active money is waiting out the unlock — no supply-demand fix before 8/6, and a successful-launch rally most likely opens the exit window for trapped longs
Down 3.1% to $131.11, a third day under the IPO price with the space-sector sweep piling on — no antidote for trapped passive money before the 8/6 earnings-and-lockup double event; sidelines
Down 0.6% to $135.27, below the IPO price for the first time — the passive money is now all underwater; staying sidelined into the 8/6 earnings-plus-lockup double event
With a 3–5% float, price discovery waits until lock-ups release supply. First earnings and first expiry on the same day make 8/6 a revaluation event, not a trading day.
Down 4.5% to $145.30, the lowest since listing under broken-IPO shadow and lock-up anxiety; observation only until a right-side signal
Up 2.6% yet still 9% off range lows with WSB heat cooling (138→101); no verdict before the lock-up passes
Down 0.8% in choppy post-IPO trade, 4% off range lows; WSB #5 buzz can't soothe lock-up anxiety
Stay sidelined: the give-back isn't done, and $147 is the level everyone watches — a hold starts a double bottom, a break fires the next leg down. No need to pick a side before the Starship flight late this month.
Shift from long to sidelines: the inclusion catalyst lands today, and history says inclusion marks the top with a one-month give-back. $4.3B passive vs. trapped-supply distribution makes the short-term game messy. Holders can scale out into any inclusion-day spike to bank the gain.
Index inclusion is guaranteed passive demand, and the Starship flight is a lottery option — clean event-driven logic. But this is a swing, not a hold: the inclusion premium historically unwinds within a month. The stop below the $147 post-IPO low is non-negotiable.
Index-inclusion passive buying is a near-certain event and price is at the range low — good odds. Mind the 'sell the news' effect: close event positions around July 7.