Daily Brief Archive: August 7, 2026 — U.S. & Hong Kong Stock Analysis

Free preview

U.S. Markets

  • The Dow fell 0.9%, ending a five-day streak; S&P -0.2%, Nasdaq -0.1%
  • Index moves were mild while single-name earnings were slaughtered
  • HONA -23.2%: a $300M guidance cut as casting shortages choke aftermarket
  • APP -19.7%, DDOG -19.0% and HUBS -19.1% all cratered the same day
  • WDC -13.0%: falling NAND spot pricing outweighed an earnings beat
  • Rising Treasury yields plus firmer crude marked the first ebb in risk appetite

Hong Kong

  • The Hang Seng fell 1.49% to 25,530.28; HS Tech -2.28%
  • Southbound flows flipped to net selling of HK$1.46B
  • Platforms fell broadly: Baidu -4%, Alibaba -2.89%, Tencent -2.64%
  • HK memory names fell in sympathy with WDC stateside
  • AI model names bucked the tape: MiniMax +17%, Zhipu +4%
  • Coal and TCM names firmed as money rotated defensive

Today's Watchlist

  • SNDK grew revenue 372% at an 84.6% gross margin, yet fell 6.81%
  • Falling NAND spot pricing is the memory chain's core variable today
  • SNDK's multiple compressed to 17.3x post-earnings, a valuation reset
  • Beats punished again: guidance now outweighs the quarter itself
  • INSM +33.9% on TPIP data and peak sales guidance above $14B
  • SPCX +6.14% as the lockup supply shock failed to materialize

Deep Dives (5 names)

Long
Score8/10Q4 revenue $8.97B / +372% YoYGross margin 84.6%P/E TTM 17.3 (was 49.6)Q1 FY27 guide $10.3–10.8BBuyback added $140亿 / $14B

Technicals — It closed at $1,258.58, down 6.81%, yet the week is still up 10.9% — the earlier run absorbed part of the earnings expectation, making this a sell-the-news reaction rather than a collapse. Price holds above the 20-day but sits 25.8% below the 50-day ($1,695.65) and far above the 200-day ($866.93). RSI(14) at 43.1 and RSI(7) at 43.0 are both neutral-to-soft with no overbought pressure. ATR of $188.27 implies a 15.0% daily range, still the most extreme on the board. The stock is 46.5% below its June high of $2,354.39 and down 22.3% on the month.

Fundamentals — FY26 Q4 revenue reached $8.965B, up 51% sequentially and 372% year over year, with GAAP net income of $6.90B and diluted EPS of $43.97, non-GAAP EPS of $39.25 and an 84.6% gross margin — all above the top end of guidance. Full-year revenue of $20.25B grew 175%. Roughly one third of the sequential gain came from volume and two thirds from pricing. Q1 FY27 guidance calls for revenue of $10.3–10.8B, a non-GAAP gross margin of 83–85% and EPS of $44–46, alongside a new $14B buyback authorization. The pivotal change: the trailing multiple fell from 49.6x pre-print to 17.3x — driven not by the share price but by an explosion in the earnings denominator.

News — SanDisk released FY26 Q4 results after the close on 8/5, beating the high end of guidance on every metric. Yet the stock fell 6.81% on 8/6 — not because of the print but because of what Western Digital said the same day: NAND spot pricing has turned down sharply, raising concerns about memory makers' gross margins. WDC plunged 13.03% and dragged the whole chain with it. The market's logic is plain: two thirds of SanDisk's 84.6% margin came from pricing, so if NAND has peaked, that margin is a cycle-top reading rather than a run rate. Management's Q1 FY27 guidance of an 83–85% gross margin explicitly disputes that reading.

Short-term · 1–3 weeks
Long Lean bullish

Moving from sidelines to lean bullish, and the reason is that the print replaced the valuation framework: the trailing multiple fell from 49.6x to 17.3x, Q1 FY27 guidance calls for another 15% revenue step with margins held at 83–85%, and a $14B buyback was added. I refused to take a direction ahead of the print on the grounds that meeting expectations would be sell-the-news — instead it massively beat and was sold anyway, because what's being sold is a NAND price forecast rather than this company's operations. Enter at $1,180–1,250 on a pullback within this week's range, stop at $1,090 structurally above the $1,015.89 low from 7/29, and target $1,520 short of the 50-day at $1,695.65. The risk is explicit: if NAND spot keeps falling fast, management's margin guidance is invalidated and $1,090 is where I admit it.

Entry $1180~1250Stop $1090Target $1520
Long-term · months+
Accumulate

A 17.3x multiple against 175% full-year revenue growth and an 84.6% gross margin, plus a $14B buyback and multiyear customer agreements, says this is not a one-quarter accident. AI enterprise SSD demand and the High Bandwidth Flash standard give NAND a path from storage medium to compute architecture.

  • Falling NAND spot pricing puts at risk the two thirds of margin that came from price
  • A 15.0% daily range demands extremely strict position sizing
  • A low multiple at peak cyclical earnings has historically been a trap
Signal BacktestCumulative -31.04%price itself -27.88%0/1 closed trades wonprofitable since 07-24
  • 07-22Long$1,589.4 → closed $1,096.107-29-31.04%
  • 08-07Long$1,258.58 → open → $1,258.58+0.00%
Community Voices
  • WSB · Mentions collapsed from 1,019 to 286, seven tenths gone in a day. Packed on earnings night, deserted the morning after. Whoever stayed is looking at 17.3x earnings, not a crowdOriginal ↗
Institutional Views
  • 华尔街共识 · 30 analysts average a $2,274.74 target, roughly 80.7% above spot, at a 1.33 rating leaning strong buy — trimmed from $2,363.65 yesterday but still among the widest gaps on the board
Long
Score8/10RSI(14) 47.91-week gain +11.1%P/E TTM 20.0Gross margin 72.6%Consensus upside +76.4%

Technicals — It closed at $881.47, down just 1.31% on a day the memory chain was gutted — WDC fell 13.03% and SNDK 6.81% — and that relative strength is the most notable data point today. Price remains 9.3% below the 50-day ($971.96) and far above the 200-day ($531.67). RSI(14) at 47.9 and RSI(7) at 50.1 are both neutral. The 11.1% weekly gain is intact and the monthly decline narrowed from -14.3% to -4.5%. ATR of $84.95 implies a 9.6% daily range. The intraday span of $827.00–$905.80 was violent but the close landed in the upper half. The $800 level remains the structural line beneath my stop reference.

Fundamentals — Trailing revenue of roughly $41.46B grew 167% with EPS up 697% on a 72.6% gross margin — elite for a memory supplier — at 20.0x earnings. The key distinction from SanDisk is business mix: Micron's profit engine is DRAM and HBM, whereas today's panic concerns NAND spot pricing. Bank of America's framing is worth recording: its base case already assumes Micron's DRAM prices fall 10% and NAND 18% in calendar 2028, and even under a severe bear case it believes Micron sustains strong profitability relative to prior cycles.

News — Micron swung through a wide $827.00–$905.80 range on 8/6 before closing down 1.31%. The whole semiconductor and memory complex was under pressure: Western Digital collapsed 13.03% on a sudden drop in NAND spot pricing and elevated inventory ahead of its planned separation, while SanDisk fell 6.81% despite a large beat. The central debate has shifted from whether AI demand is real to whether hyperscalers will earn attractive returns on their enormous AI investments, and after a huge first half for memory stocks many investors are locking in gains. Bank of America reiterated its bullish stance, arguing Micron's profitability far exceeds prior cycles even under a severe pricing decline.

Short-term · 1–3 weeks
Long Lean bullish

Maintaining the long. Today was this position's first stress test and it passed: with the chain gutted — WDC -13.03%, SNDK -6.81% — Micron gave back only 1.31% and kept an 11.1% week intact. Business mix is the reason: today's panic originated in NAND spot pricing while Micron's profit engine is DRAM and HBM. The stop stays at $798 below the $800 level, a break of which invalidates the whole reversal; the entry zone shifts slightly from $855–885 to $845–880 and the target holds at $1,000. BofA's base case already embeds 2028 price declines, which buys this position time.

Entry $845~880Stop $798Target $1000
Long-term · months+
Accumulate

A 20.0x multiple against a 72.6% gross margin and 167% revenue growth, with structural HBM and DRAM demand driven directly by AI compute. BofA's bear-case math shows that even if a pricing downcycle arrives, the earnings base sits far above prior cycle troughs.

  • If falling NAND spot pricing spreads to DRAM, the valuation framework gets rewritten
  • There is still no data on the timing or scale of CXMT's ramp
  • Doubts over hyperscaler returns on AI capex weigh on the entire sector's multiple
Signal BacktestCumulative -27.69%price itself -14.61%0/2 closed trades wonprofitable since 07-10
  • 07-07Long$984.75 → closed $853.207-17-13.36%
  • 07-22Long$970.82 → closed $820.5307-29-15.48%
  • 08-05Long$892.67 → open → $881.47-1.25%
Community Voices
  • WSB · Mentions fell from 357 to 223 for fifth place, with the crowd cooling while price gave up only 1.31%. WSB left, the price didn't — that divergence usually means the shares changed hands from retail to somebody elseOriginal ↗
Institutional Views
  • 华尔街共识 · 56 analysts average a $1,554.51 target, roughly 76.4% above spot, at a 1.15 rating near strong buy
  • Bank of America · Reiterated its bullish view; the base case already assumes 10% DRAM and 18% NAND price declines in 2028, and even a severe bear case leaves earnings far above prior cyclesSource ↗
Neutral
Score6/10RSI(14) 40.1Q4 results EPS $3.56 / $3.75BP/E TTM 18.7ATR $55.75Consensus upside +48.7%

Technicals — It closed at $451.52, down 13.03%, with relative volume of 2.02x confirming panic selling. Price sliced 19.8% below the 50-day ($563.12) while holding 32.9% above the 200-day ($339.64). RSI(14) at 40.1 and RSI(7) at 33.6 have weakened without reaching oversold, meaning there is technically room to fall further. The stock is down 11.8% on the week and 15.2% on the month, with an ATR of $55.75 implying a 12.3% daily range, and sits 43.6% below its $799.87 high. There is no clear technical support beneath; the nearest structural level is the $400 round number.

Fundamentals — The quarter delivered EPS of $3.56 on $3.75B of revenue, beating on both lines, with trailing net income up 371.3% at a multiple of just 18.7x. But trailing revenue is down 2.7%, which exposes the problem: the earnings surge came from pricing rather than volume. Three pressures compound — a sudden drop in NAND spot pricing threatening gross margin, intensifying competition, and high inventory ahead of the planned business separation. The company beat and cut guidance in the same breath, the combination markets tolerate least.

News — Western Digital's 13.03% plunge on 8/6 was the epicenter of the day's memory selloff. The company beat on both sales and earnings yet cut guidance, and the reason it gave was industry-wide: a sudden downturn in NAND spot pricing, compounded by intensifying competition and elevated inventory ahead of the business separation, all threatening gross margin. The damage far exceeded the company itself — it dragged SanDisk (-6.81%) and Micron (-1.31%) down the same day, even though SanDisk had just posted 372% revenue growth at an 84.6% gross margin. Today's pricing logic across the entire memory chain was rewritten by that single line from Western Digital.

Short-term · 1–3 weeks
Neutral Sidelines

No direction here. WDC must be separated from SNDK and MU: SanDisk and Micron were dragged down by someone else's news, while Western Digital supplied its own reason to cut. Trailing revenue down 2.7% shows its earnings surge came entirely from pricing — precisely what is now in question — making it the most levered of the three to this cycle. RSI(14) at 40.1 is not yet oversold, so there is technical room below, and the 48.7% consensus upside is stale data from before the cut. High inventory ahead of the separation is a variable with a timeline but no price. Wait for evidence NAND spot has stabilized.

Entry Sidelines; wait for evidence NAND spot pricing has stabilizedStop —Target —
Long-term · months+
Neutral

A 18.7x multiple against 371.3% earnings growth looks cheap, but trailing revenue down 2.7% shows the earnings rest entirely on price. The separation may unlock value, but only after the inventory and pricing variables settle.

  • Falling NAND spot pricing hits gross margin directly, as the company itself confirmed
  • High inventory ahead of the separation becomes a liability in a falling-price cycle
  • Consensus targets don't yet reflect the guidance cut, leaving downgrade risk
Community Voices
  • WSB · Mentions fell from 165 to 71: down 13% and nobody showed up to buy the dip. Retail read it correctly — when a company itself says inventory is high and prices are falling, that isn't a mispricingOriginal ↗
Institutional Views
  • 华尔街共识 · 30 analysts average a $671.57 target, about 48.7% above spot, at a 1.35 buy rating — but these predate the guidance cut and a reset is unavoidable
Long
Score8/10RSI(14) 61.41-week gain +13.2%P/E TTM 33.5Gross margin 74.1%Consensus upside +43.5%

Technicals — It closed at $218.99, down 0.10%, essentially unmoved on a day the memory chain was gutted and semis broadly struggled — among the strongest relative showings today. Price sits well above the 50-day ($205.85) and 200-day ($193.77) in a complete bullish stack. RSI(14) at 61.4 is healthily firm with RSI(7) at 71.2 warm but manageable. Weekly and monthly gains of 13.2% and 13.8% leave it just 7.4% below the $236.54 high. ATR of $7.79 implies a 3.6% daily range, among the mildest of today's deep dives — a number that by itself explains the difference in holding experience.

Fundamentals — Trailing revenue grew 70.7% and EPS 110.3% on a 74.1% gross margin at 33.5x earnings — an unusually good growth-to-valuation match at a $5.3T market capitalization. Sixty-four analysts carry a 1.12 rating near strong buy with an average target of $314.29 implying 43.5% upside, the most unified bullish consensus among megacap tech. The market's emerging doubt about hyperscaler returns on AI capex is in theory Nvidia's largest long-term risk, yet in the near term it remains the direct recipient of that spending.

News — Nvidia finished essentially flat on 8/6, down 0.10%, showing marked resilience amid a broad tech and semiconductor selloff. Two pressures drove the sector: the NAND pricing panic triggered by Western Digital that dragged the memory chain, and a newly concentrated doubt over whether hyperscalers can earn attractive returns on their enormous AI investments — the first systematic challenge to the entire AI capex narrative. Headlines around Samsung and China's DeepSeek added further noise. Against that backdrop, Nvidia's flat close shows the market still prices it apart from the memory makers.

Short-term · 1–3 weeks
Long Bullish

Maintaining the long and the bullish stance. Today's entire signal is relative strength: the memory chain was gutted, semis broadly struggled, the AI capex narrative faced its first systematic challenge — and it fell 0.10%. Entry at $208–216 above the 50-day at $205.85, stop at $198 structurally above the 200-day at $193.77, and a $250 target just beyond the $236.54 high. With a 3.6% ATR, that 9.6% stop distance absorbs more than two standard deviations of daily movement, so this can be sized as a normal allocation rather than a wager — a scarce property among today's names.

Entry $208~216Stop $198Target $250
Long-term · months+
Accumulate

A 74.1% gross margin and 70.7% revenue growth still hold at a $5.3T valuation, and 33.5x is not expensive for that pair. Sixty-four analysts converging on 43.5% upside reflects fundamental consensus rather than a crowded trade.

  • If hyperscaler returns on AI capex are disproven, demand contracts in step
  • Customer-designed ASICs such as Broadcom's erode general-purpose GPU share over time
  • Geopolitical and export-control variables on China revenue are hard to price
Signal BacktestCumulative +7.56%price itself +10.84%1/1 closed trades wonprofitable since 07-07
  • 07-04Long$194.83 → closed $202.8107-18+4.10%
  • 08-05Long$211.94 → open → $218.99+3.33%
Community Voices
  • WSB · Mentions fell from 226 to 153 for sixth place: the chatter receded while the price didn't move an inch. This shareholder base stopped consulting forums a long time agoOriginal ↗
Institutional Views
  • 华尔街共识 · 64 analysts average a $314.29 target, roughly 43.5% above spot, at a 1.12 rating near strong buy
Neutral
Score6/10RSI(14) 42.51-day gain +6.14%Q2 revenue $7.81B / +92%Q2 capex $184亿 / $18.4BLockup expiry 8/6, now passed

Technicals — It closed at $114.92, up 6.14%, on relative volume of 2.93x — a high-volume advance on lockup day, the opposite of what the market broadly expected. The name still lacks 50-day and 200-day references, leaving the $104.83–$225.64 52-week range as the only anchor, with price 9.6% above the low and 49.1% below the high. RSI(14) at 42.5 and RSI(7) at 46.2 are both neutral. The week is down just 0.2% while the month is down 27.7%. ATR of $11.10 implies a 9.7% daily range. Technical analysis here remains constrained by the absence of moving-average structure.

Fundamentals — Q2 revenue of $7.81B grew 92% and beat estimates, but quarterly capital expenditure of roughly $18.4B ran at 2.4x revenue. The company is now a three-segment enterprise spanning space, connectivity and AI following the February 2026 integration of xAI and X, at a market capitalization near $1.51T. There is still no P/E or gross margin available for cross-checking, making it the least financially transparent name in today's deep dives. The $227.09 consensus target implies 97.6% upside, the highest on the board — but that figure rests on an extremely thin base of verifiable financials.

News — August 6 was SpaceX's first major post-listing lockup expiration — the foreseeable supply shock I named explicitly in the two prior briefs. The outcome inverted the expectation: the stock rose 6.14% on relative volume of 2.93x. The maiden report after the close on 8/4 had knocked it as much as 8.8% postmarket on $18.4B of quarterly capex, but that damage was largely repaired within two sessions. Two things follow: the market had priced lockup selling fully, arguably excessively, in advance; and the 92% revenue growth narrative still finds buyers. The question of payback on that capex isn't resolved — merely deferred.

Short-term · 1–3 weeks
Neutral Sidelines

Staying sidelined, but the part I got wrong needs stating plainly: in the two prior briefs I flagged the 8/6 lockup as a foreseeable supply shock, and the actual outcome was a 6.14% advance on heavy volume. That call was directionally wrong, because the market had already priced the selling in advance. The core reason for taking no direction, however, still holds unchanged: without a 50-day or 200-day, a stop cannot be set reliably; quarterly capex at 2.4x revenue leaves the payback period entirely unclear; and there is no P/E or gross margin to cross-check. A 97.6% consensus upside cannot be supported by verifiable financials. Wait for the moving-average structure to form.

Entry Sidelines; wait until a 50-day forms and a technical framework becomes possibleStop —Target —
Long-term · months+
Neutral

Revenue growth of 92% and a unique three-segment footprint across space, connectivity and AI make for an unmatched asset base, and the strength on lockup day shows the market will pay a premium for that narrative. But with quarterly capex at $18.4B, the valuation rests on story until free cash flow turns positive.

  • The payback period on $18.4B of quarterly capex is entirely unclear
  • Without P/E or gross margin data, the valuation cannot be cross-checked
  • Lockup selling didn't hit on day one, but the added float is a persistent supply
Signal BacktestCumulative +1.83%price itself -27.05%1/1 closed trades wonprofitable since 07-04
  • 07-02Long$157.54 → closed $160.4207-07+1.83%
Community Voices
  • WSB · At 398 mentions for third place, easing from 450 but still near the top with 1,508 upvotes. Retail didn't run on lockup day — it stayed to watch, an unusual composure for the occasionOriginal ↗
Institutional Views
  • 华尔街共识 · 38 analysts average a $227.09 target, a striking 97.6% above spot, at a 1.37 buy rating — the widest upside on the board, backed by the least verifiable financial data

Rapid Scan (22 names)

TickerCloseChangeScoreDirectionOne-line take
GOOGL logoGOOGLUS$357.75-1.29%7LongDown 1.29% and pinned right at the 50-day of $357.20 with RSI back to neutral at 52.4; at 18.0x against 112% EPS growth it remains the cheapest of the giants. Maintaining the long.
AMD logoAMDUS$489.28+1.50%6NeutralUp 1.50% but still below the 50-day at $514.33 with RSI neutral at 47.8, as WSB mentions collapsed from 1,137 to 71, down 94%. Post-earnings attention drained without the position improving; staying sidelined.
MSFT logoMSFTUS$499.86+2.54%7NeutralUp 2.54% against the tape to $499.86, but RSI at 78.1 and RSI(7) at 86.1 are deeply overbought with consensus upside of just 12.3%. Closed out yesterday; staying sidelined pending a pullback.
NET logoNETUS$284.43-2.91%6NeutralDown 2.91% off the $305.00 high with RSI easing to neutral at 58.7; the $267.69 consensus target still sits 5.9% below spot and the valuation remains undigested after the 8/6 print. Staying sidelined.
NBIS logoNBISUS$189.88-13.29%5NeutralDown 13.29% on doubts over AI capex returns and pressure across neoclouds, with RSI neutral at 46.2 yet still 15% below the 50-day at $223.94; volatility ahead of the 8/12 print is extreme. Sidelines.
TTD logoTTDUS$17.67-6.80%5NeutralDown 6.80% on 5.18x volume with WSB mentions exploding from 1 to 73; at 19.9x it looks cheap, but it sits 69% below its high and under all three moving averages with the adtech reset unfinished. Sidelines.
SOUN logoSOUNUS$7.08+10.11%4NeutralUp 10.11% and 22.9% for the week with RSI at 59.4 reclaiming the 50-day at $6.87, yet still 23% below the 200-day at $9.25 and 68% off its high, with no earnings anchor in voice AI. Sidelines.
AAOI logoAAOIUS$124.22-3.38%5NeutralDown 3.38% though the week is still up 49.0%, with RSI neutral at 52.8; the optics theme cooled amid AI capex doubts and price remains below the 50-day at $139.11. Sidelines.
IOVA logoIOVAUS$6.21+43.09%5NeutralUp 43.09% to a $6.39 52-week high on 5.65x volume after a 46.1% month with RSI at 69.8; cell therapy commercialization isn't yet profitable and the move has no valuation anchor. Sidelines.
HTZ logoHTZUS$2.02+29.49%3NeutralUp 29.49% on 7.13x volume as WSB mentions exploded a hundredfold from 14 to 1,396, taking the top spot site-wide — yet price is still 36% below the 50-day at $3.18 and 75% off its high. Pure sentiment; sidelines.
MARA logoMARAUS$10.65-5.25%4NeutralDown 5.25% with RSI weak at 41.1 after a 16.1% month, still below the 50-day at $12.94 and 200-day at $11.60; bitcoin miners are pressured as risk appetite ebbs. Sidelines.
RGTI logoRGTIUS$16.53-1.49%4NeutralDown 1.49% though the week is up 21.5%, with RSI neutral at 50.9; the quantum-computing concept remains below the 50-day at $18.68 and 200-day at $21.27, 72% off its high. Sidelines.
TEAM logoTEAMUS$110.17-2.78%5NeutralDown 2.78% with the software pullback, RSI still firm at 63.0 after a 23.6% month above the 200-day at $108.09 — but with DDOG and HUBS cratering, this isn't the environment to chase. Sidelines.
TWLO logoTWLOUS$193.2-0.01%5NeutralEssentially flat with RSI neutral at 45.2, still below the 50-day at $202.08 after a 9.5% month; no clear inflection in CPaaS demand. Sidelines.
DOCS logoDOCSUS$20.66-4.48%4NeutralDown 4.48% on 7.7x volume with RSI weakening to 44.3, 73% below its high and 37% under the 200-day at $32.58; the valuation reset for the physician network isn't finished. Sidelines.
DKNG logoDKNGUS$22.17+1.88%4NeutralUp 1.88% but with RSI weak at 35.9 after a 16.0% month, still below the 50-day at $25.33 and 200-day at $27.39; both demand and regulation remain uncertain. Sidelines.
WEN logoWENUS$7.39-7.51%4NeutralDown 7.51% on 2.05x volume with RSI at 47.9, below the 50-day at $7.40 and 200-day at $7.73; quick-service demand is soft. Sidelines.
REPL logoREPLUS$12.86+8.71%4NeutralUp 8.71% capping an extraordinary 145.0% week, with RSI at 62.4 above the 50-day at $9.81 and 200-day at $7.97; a clinical-stage biotech with no earnings anchor after such a move. Sidelines.
RCAT logoRCATUS$8.67+0.12%4NeutralUp 0.12% though the week is up 23.0%, with RSI neutral at 50.5 and price below the 50-day at $10.05 and 200-day at $11.02; the drone concept lacks a revenue anchor. Sidelines.
SEZL logoSEZLUS$178.53+2.37%4NeutralUp 2.37% toward the $195.71 high with RSI at 59.3 on 2.44x volume; credit risk in the buy-now-pay-later model amplifies as rates rise. Sidelines.
SG logoSGUS$5.87-3.77%4NeutralDown 3.77% with RSI weak at 38.2 after declines of 13.0% for the week and 28.2% for the month, below every moving average; the fast-casual expansion model is under pressure. Sidelines.
DTE logoDTEUS$139.97+0.22%5NeutralUp 0.22% with RSI(7) oversold at 24.2 but still below the 50-day at $147.00, bleeding in step with the whole utilities complex. Staying sidelined.
Stock Brief 2026-08-07: Daily U.S. & HK Market Analysis Archive · Quant Brief